Forum RSS Feed Follow @ Twitter Follow On Facebook

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
[-]
Welcome
You have to register before you can post on our site.

Username:


Password:





[-]
Latest Threads
[REQUEST] Lenovo G780 (5ECNxxWW) Whiteli...
Last Post: Dudu2002
Yesterday 12:49 PM
» Replies: 888
» Views: 560446
[REQUEST] Lenovo G770 (40CNxxWW) Whiteli...
Last Post: Akled
Yesterday 06:24 AM
» Replies: 25
» Views: 19379
ACER Aspire 7736ZG BIOS microcode update...
Last Post: JoH
Yesterday 12:29 AM
» Replies: 12
» Views: 871
[REQUEST] Sony Vaio VGN-NR260E (R1101J9)...
Last Post: JustHaven
03-10-2026 01:19 AM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 154
[REQUEST] Lenovo IdeaPad P400, P500, Z40...
Last Post: asko87
03-09-2026 11:40 AM
» Replies: 80
» Views: 66376
HP Pro 3300 & 3400 (H61): Upgrade to Ivy...
Last Post: Hooper
03-08-2026 08:51 PM
» Replies: 141
» Views: 146972
Acer Aspire 7540G { Unlocked BIOS in pos...
Last Post: jose678
03-08-2026 03:51 PM
» Replies: 35
» Views: 42744
[REQUEST] Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315...
Last Post: yusuferkan
03-08-2026 08:50 AM
» Replies: 49
» Views: 25298
Lenovo v470c phoenix BIOS advanced setti...
Last Post: lolvatveo
03-08-2026 07:51 AM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 1551
Optiplex 7050 8th gen support
Last Post: exe127
03-07-2026 07:28 PM
» Replies: 10
» Views: 889
[REQUEST] Lenovo G50-70 (9ACNxxWW) White...
Last Post: zuzu_ion
03-07-2026 11:23 AM
» Replies: 254
» Views: 150354
[Request] Dell Optiplex 3040M 7th Gen CP...
Last Post: DeathBringer
03-07-2026 10:58 AM
» Replies: 6
» Views: 3331
delete whitelist for thinkpad l460
Last Post: andromedych007
03-05-2026 07:25 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 275
[Request] Enabling PCI-E bifurcation on ...
Last Post: fenomena6909
03-05-2026 05:03 AM
» Replies: 3
» Views: 4474
Asus Zephyrus G16 GU605CR request for bi...
Last Post: FlorikDT
03-05-2026 04:42 AM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 224
[REQUEST] Lenovo G700 (7ACNxxWW) Whiteli...
Last Post: Duh-bm
03-04-2026 07:57 PM
» Replies: 165
» Views: 108058
[REQUEST] Lenovo Thinkpad X240 (GIETxxWW...
Last Post: Defekt2008
03-03-2026 02:18 PM
» Replies: 344
» Views: 227643
Lenovo ThinkPad Edge E530: I'm trying to...
Last Post: MadBerry
03-03-2026 01:53 PM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 323
Request to unlock advance features in Ac...
Last Post: napsteronly
03-03-2026 07:57 AM
» Replies: 71
» Views: 94326
[Request] Unlocking BIOS for iMedia D361...
Last Post: SplatPie
03-03-2026 04:20 AM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 221

AMIMMWIN.exe: handling duplicate module IDs
#1
Wotcher chaps, first post Smile hope I've put it in the right place...

I am experimenting with a couple of AMI BIOSes which are causing me difficulties because they have multiple modules with the same ID (0xE1), and AMIMMWIN, MMTOOL and so forth do not like this.

Extracting the modules I seem to be OK with since I can just copy the relevant chunk out of the BIOS image by hand using "cat foo.rom | tail -c +(start position + 1) | head -c (length)".

It's re-inserting them that is the problem since the tools only seem to allow me to insert the first one. On trying to insert the second, they complain that the module already exists in the BIOS image and there seems to be no way to specify that this is not a problem in this instance.

With option ROM modules (ID 0x20) or language modules (ID 0x21) they are distinguished from each other by their vendor:device IDs or country code:flags values. These ID 0xE1 modules, however, do not have such things, the segment:offset values are shown as 0 in all cases.

So, firstly, is there some incantation to persuade the tools to stop complaining? I can't find any such in the documentation or on Google.

If not, how about putting the modules in by hand? I can't find the format documented anywhere either. Does the BIOS simply scan through all the modules using data in the modules themselves to identify where each one starts and ends, in which case I could more or less just reverse my extraction method, or is there a table of start addresses or something which needs to be updated as well?

Or is my best bet likely to be something like hacking the binaries of the tools to disable the duplicate-module check?

Please don't suggest anything too Windows-specific as I am on Linux and am running the tools under wine (so I have the problem that most versions of them crash under wine on top of the problem of random BIOS corruption from the horrendous bugginess of the tools themselves... is this rubbish really what professional motherboard engineers make BIOSes with?) On the other hand I am not worried about flashing a dud image since I have a standalone programmer, so I can recover, it's just highly inconvenient because the programmer runs off the parallel port so is horribly slow).

Thanks in advance... Smile
find
quote
#2
Are you using insert or replace in MMtool? Insert will only insert a module with a different ID to those already in the rom. Replace will, as it's name suggests, replace the module.

Also which version of MMtool are you using?

[Image: x79sig.jpg]
| BitFenix Shinobi XL | i7-3820 5GHz | P9X79 PRO | 32GB DDR3 | 2x HD6970 | 240GB SSD |
www find
quote
#3
(02-08-2013, 02:20 AM)paradigital Wrote: Are you using insert or replace in MMtool? Insert will only insert a module with a different ID to those already in the rom. Replace will, as it's name suggests, replace the module.

That's exactly the problem. The BIOSes I'm fiddling with have two, or three, modules which have the same ID - and no segment:offset values to distinguish them, unlike PCI addon ROM modules. Whatever tool the BIOSes were created with must therefore have some method of getting around the unique-ID restriction.

(02-08-2013, 02:20 AM)paradigital Wrote: Also which version of MMtool are you using?

The most usable version seems to be 2221beta in "power" mode. Though mostly I am using AMIMMWIN 1.20 from the command line instead as it is more reliable. MMtool tends to crash under wine.
find
quote


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)